User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3.0; en-gb; HTC Xplorer A310e Build/GRJ90) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1 MicroMessenger/4.5.1.261
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCXplorer A310e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.3.0GenericAndroid 4.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WeChat 4.5 Android 4.3HTCXplorer A310esmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3.0closeAndroid 4.3.0HTCXplorer A310ecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 4.3.0HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WeChat 4.5.1.261Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5HTCXplorer A310emobile:smartyescloseclose0.12401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.3closeAndroid 4.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:37 | by ThaDafinser