User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 - James BOT - WebCrawler http://cognitiveseo.com/bot.html
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-602.php
yesJamesBOTBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesJamesBOTBot/Crawler0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.6closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.6closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWebCrawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.6closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.6Gecko 20070725Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.6Gecko 1.8.1Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:37 | by ThaDafinser