User agent detail

Safari/8536.30.1 CFNetwork/596.4.3 Darwin/12.4.0 (x86_64) (Macmini6%2C2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Safari 6.0MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 8536.30.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.8.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 596.4.3closeMac OS X 10.8.4AppleMacmini6,2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.4desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
CFNetwork App closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:36 | by ThaDafinser