User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S5380/Z3x_tmXXKK4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Default Browser 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknownunknownunknown Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeBada SamsungWave Ymobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGT-S5380smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S5380closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Bada SamsungWave Ymobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S5380Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:36 | by ThaDafinser