User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; AUXUS CoreX4 3G Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 26.0.1410.58Android 4.0.4WebKit iBerryCoreX4 3Gtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.0iBerryCoreX4 3Gtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410closeAndroid 4.0.4AUXUS CoreX4 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.58WebKit 537.31Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1410.58Webkit 537.31Android 4.0.4iBerryAuxus CoreX4tabletyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:36 | by ThaDafinser