User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; en-US; ARCHOS_97_CARBON Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/8.6.0.318 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos97_CARBON Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Android 4.0ArchosTitaniumsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeAndroid 4.0.3Archos97_CARBONcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.318WebKit 528.5Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.54805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Webkit 528.5Android 4.0.3Archos97 Carbontabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:35 | by ThaDafinser