User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092903 Mandriva/1.9.0.3-1mdv2009.0 (2009.0) Firefox/3.0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.0.3Mandriva 2009Gecko 1.9.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko Mandriva 1.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.3closeMandriva 2009.0closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.3Gecko 2008092903Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.3Gecko 1.9.0Mandriva 2009desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:35 | by ThaDafinser