User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; N8-00; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) MiniBrowserMobile/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-minibrowser.yaml
MiniBrowser 4.0Series60 Webkit 534.3NokiaN8-00mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close NokiaN8-00closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 534.3 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MiniBrowser 4.0Webkit 534.3Series60 NokiaN8-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:35 | by ThaDafinser