User agent detail

samsung-sgh-l811/UC Browser7.8.0.95/69/400 UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungsgh-l811 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-sgh-l811 UCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95close Samsungsgh-l811mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Samsungsgh-l811smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0close Samsungsgh-l811closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Samsungsgh-l811mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:34 | by ThaDafinser