User agent detail

SCH-R210 UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Openwave 6.2 SamsungSCH-R210mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA SamsungSCH-R210Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SCH-R210 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close SamsungSCH-R210mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungSCH-R210smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungSCH-R210mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSCH-R210Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:34 | by ThaDafinser