User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) adbeat.com/policy AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) Firefox/34.0 Safari/537.21
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-857.php
yesAdbeat BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdbeat BotBot/Crawler0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.21closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 34.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 34.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 34.0WebKit 537.21Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 34.0Webkit 537.21Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 34.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:34 | by ThaDafinser