User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S8000/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 Jasmine/1.0 Nextreaming SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS8000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Jasmine 1.0NetFront JAVA SamsungGT-S8000Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S8000 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungGT-S8000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Jasmine 1.0 SamsungS8000smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Jasmine 1.0close SamsungS8000closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Jasmine 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 1.0 Touchwiz 2.0 or earlierSamsungJetmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-S8000Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:33 | by ThaDafinser