User agent detail

MQQBrowser/391 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4S; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser Mobile 391 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 391closeiOS 5.0SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.21502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 391WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 391closeiOS 5.0closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 391WebKit 534.46iOS 5.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 391Webkit 534.46iOS 5.0AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:33 | by ThaDafinser