User agent detail

Mozilla/4.04_(X11;_I;_OSF_3.2d)/1.0 libwww/4.0D
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4Digital Unix 3.2 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4closeDigital Unix 3.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.04_(X11;_I;_OSF_3.2d)/1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.4 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.0.4 Digital Unix 3.2desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:32 | by ThaDafinser