User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SH01C;FOMA;like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoSH01C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close SharpSH01Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoSH01Ccloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SharpSH01Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo SH01Ccloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoSH-01AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.06401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:32 | by ThaDafinser