User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (13, vmvid v2.1) - alps GT-N7102 samsung - 00000000-2D04-A521-9D0B-840A04C6DBDF
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
alpsGT-N7102 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid Samsung- 00000000-2D04-A521-9D0B-840A04C6DBDFmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGT-N7102smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid alpsGT-N7102closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android Samsung- 00000000-2D04-A521-9D0B-840A04C6DBDFmobile:smartyescloseclose0.10401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:32 | by ThaDafinser