User agent detail

WIRE/0.11 (Linux; i686; Robot,Spider,Crawler,aromano@cli.di.unipi.it)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WIRE 0.11 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WIRE 0.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesWIRE/0.11 bclose0.49805 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWIREclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Linux closeclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:31 | by ThaDafinser