User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.1; U; Edition Next; Edition IBIS; xx) Presto/2.10.238 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 12.00Windows XPPresto 2.10.238desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.00Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.238Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.00Presto 2.10.238Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:31 | by ThaDafinser