User agent detail

MOT-A-C8/00.00 UP.Browser/7.0.2.2.c.1.126 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/5.1.2.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-C8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-C8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.126close Motorolai294/i296mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 7.0.2close MotorolaA-C8closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 7.0.2.2.c.1.126 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 7.0 MotorolaA-C8mobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai294/i296Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:31 | by ThaDafinser