User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/418.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/419.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 419.3closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 418.8Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 418.8OS X desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:30 | by ThaDafinser