User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (J2ME/MIDP; MXit WebBot/1.8.3.119) Opera Mini/3.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
MXit WebBot 1.8.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 3.1closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 3.1close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMXit WebBotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 3.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:30 | by ThaDafinser