User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Tizen 2.1; sdk) AppleWebKit/537.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/2.1 Mobile Safari/537.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-tizen.yaml
Tizen 2.1Webkit 537.3emulator Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 2.1closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 2.1WebKit Tizen 2.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 2.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 2.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 2.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.3Tizen 2.1emulatorcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 2.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:30 | by ThaDafinser