User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; zh-CN; HTC T528t Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.6.3.413 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCT528t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCT528tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6WebKit Android 4.0HTCT528tsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.3closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCT528tcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.3.413WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4HTCOne STmobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:29 | by ThaDafinser