User agent detail

Mozilla/4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux 2.2.12 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.6Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.61closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 2.2.12closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.61 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Communicator 4.6.1 Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:28 | by ThaDafinser