User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/6.0.0.28.28;FBBV/1264000;FBDM/{density=1.5,width=480,height=800};FBLC/de_DE;FBCR/o2 - de;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/HTC Incredible S;FBSV/4.0.4;FBOP/19;FBCA/armeabi-v7a:armeabi;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCIncredible S Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close HTCIncredible Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.22802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 6.0 HTCIncredible Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 6.0.0close HTCIncredible Scloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook HTCIncredible Smobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:28 | by ThaDafinser