User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.0) SiteCheck-sitecrawl by Siteimprove.com
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
SiteCheck-sitecrawl Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows 2000desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSiteCheck-sitecrawlclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:27 | by ThaDafinser