User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; en-us; HTC Evo 3D X515m Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) CrMo/16.0.912.77 Mobile Safari/535.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCEvo 3D X515m Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 16.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 16.0.912.77closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCPC36100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 16.0WebKit Android 4.0HTCEvo 3D X515msmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 16.0.912closeAndroid 4.0.3HTCEvo 3D X515mcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 16.0.912.77WebKit 535.7Android 4.0.3HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Beta 16.0.912.77Webkit 535.7Android 4.0.3HTCEVO 3Dmobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.77closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:26 | by ThaDafinser