User agent detail

W3C-checklink/4.81 libwww-perl/5.836
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesW3C-checklinkBot/Crawler0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
W3C-checklink 4.81closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesW3C Link CheckerValidator0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesW3C-checklinkLinkChecker0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Library for WWW in Perl 5.836 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:26 | by ThaDafinser