User agent detail

RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android LG-US670-2.2.2-43074
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGUS670 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid LGOptimus Umobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGUS670smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid LGUS670closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android LGLGUS670closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android LGOptimus Umobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:26 | by ThaDafinser