User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.135 Safari/537.36 Edge/12.10240
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-698.php
Edge 12.0Win10 10.012.0 12unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Edge 12.0Edge 12.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 12.10240closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.135closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Edge 12.10240Edge Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 12.1024closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge 12.10240closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Edge 12.10240closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Edge 12.10240WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Edge 12 EdgeHTML 12Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 12.10240closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 12.10162closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:25 | by ThaDafinser