User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; M-MP1S4B3G Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 43.0.2357.93Android 4.4.2Blink MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S4 3Gtablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.4MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S4 3Gtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.4.2MediacomM-MP1S4B3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.4.2MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S4tabletyescloseclose0.034 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.4MediacomM-MP1S4B3GTabletyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:25 | by ThaDafinser