User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; NetTAB THOR mini Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60140
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
IconBITNetTAB THOR mini Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1NetTABThor Minimobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.1.1IconBITNetTAB THOR minicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.14101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.60140WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.1.1IconBitNetTab Thor Minitabletyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 15closeAndroid 4.1NetTABThor MiniTabletyesyescloseclose0.05701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:24 | by ThaDafinser