User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 N07B(c500;TB;W24H16)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/mobilephone_docomo.yaml
docomo N07Bdocomo mobilephone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
i-mode Browser 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMoN-07Bmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoN07Bfeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoN07Bcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
N07Bcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NECN07Bmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N07Bcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoN-07BFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:24 | by ThaDafinser