User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Firefox 27.0MacOSX 10.827.0 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 27.0closeOS X 10.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 27.0Gecko Mac 10.8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 27.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 27.0closeMac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 27.0closeOS X 10.8closecloseclosecloseclose3.10531 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 27.0Gecko 20100101Mac OS X 10.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 27.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 27.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:24 | by ThaDafinser