User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 8_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/12A4331d
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-369.php
Mobile Safari UIWebView 0.0iOS 8.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS 8.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.09401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 8.0AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 8.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 8.0closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 8.0closeiOS 8.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 8.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 538.46iOS 8.0AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.63206 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 538.46iOS 8.0AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 8.0.2closeiOS 8.0.2AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:24 | by ThaDafinser