User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; BSD Four; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) rekonq Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
BSD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Rekonq close desktop-browsercloseclose0.23802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Rekonq WebKit 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Rekonq closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
rekonq close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Rekonq WebKit 533.3a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
rekonq Webkit 533.3 desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:24 | by ThaDafinser