User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 2.3.6; en-US; GT-B5510) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.1.0.386 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.1.0.386Android 2.3.6 SamsungGALAXY Y Prosmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungGT-S5360mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.1 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY Y Prosmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.1.0closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-B5510closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.0.386 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Gecko Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Y Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:23 | by ThaDafinser