User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; Haiku BePC; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21pre) Gecko/20090218 BonEcho/2.0.0.21pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox BonEcho (2.0.0.21)Haiku OS Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.21precloseHaiku OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko Haiku OS desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.21precloseHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.21preGecko 20090218BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.21Gecko 1.8.1Haiku desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:23 | by ThaDafinser