User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) SuperBird/24.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
SuperBird 24.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SuperBird 24.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.17Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.17Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:23 | by ThaDafinser