User agent detail

SonyEricssonX2i/R3AA Browser/Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UCWEB7.6.0.75/31/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonX2i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeWindows SonyEricssonX2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.6 Windows CE Sony EricssonX2ismartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.6.0closeWindows CE SonyEricssonX2icloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.6.0.75closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.6.0.75 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.6Gecko Windows Mobile Sony EricssonXperia X2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile SonyEricssonX2Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:23 | by ThaDafinser