User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (MTK; Nucleus; U; en-US) Presto/2.4.18 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
Opera Mobile 10.00Android unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.00close desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.00Presto MTK / Nucleus yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.0close closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.18 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.18MRE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:22 | by ThaDafinser