User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; Toshiba/X01T)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Windows Mobile ToshibaG900 X01Tmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows CE ToshibaX01Tsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile ToshibaG900 X01Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:20 | by ThaDafinser