User agent detail

OPPO A203/4.02/13 Release/2010.4.15 Browser/Obigo/Q03C Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 3C mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OPPO closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q03C OPPOA203smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 3close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q03C Browser Q03C closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:20 | by ThaDafinser