User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/6.0; Touch; WebView/1.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
IE 10.0WinRT8 6.26.0 unknowngeneral TabletTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0WinRT8 6.2Tabletyesyes0.07201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows RT tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows RT MicrosoftSurface RTcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows RTdesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 10(Compatibility View)closeWindows 8MicrosoftTabletyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:20 | by ThaDafinser