User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.47 Safari/535.11 MRCHROME
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Mail.ru Chromium Browser 17.0.963 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 17.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.47closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 17.0.963.47closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amigo 17.0WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.47closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mail.ru Chromium Browser 17.0.963closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.47closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 17.0.963.47WebKit 535.11Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 17Webkit 535.11Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.47closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:19 | by ThaDafinser