User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.8 (NokiaC2-01/11.00)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ibrowser.yaml
iBrowser Mini 2.8Series40 NokiaC2-01mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iBrowser 2.8WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iBrowser Mini2.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse Symbian NokiaC2-01smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 11.00)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.8close NokiaC2-01closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia C2-01closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser Mini 2.8 Series40 NokiaC2-01mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:19 | by ThaDafinser