User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.15 Safari/535.11 QQBrowser/6.13.13719.201
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
QQ Browser 6.13.13719 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 17.0WebKit WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.06101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.15closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 17.0.963.15closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.13WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.15closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser 6.13.13719closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.15closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.13.13719.201WebKit 535.11Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.13Webkit 535.11Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.15closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:18 | by ThaDafinser