User agent detail

Nokia3120Classic/2.0 (06.20) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia3120Classic Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.058 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia3120Classic 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia3120 classicmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia3120Classicsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia3120Classiccloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 3120Classiccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series40 Nokia3120 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:17 | by ThaDafinser