User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.155 Safari/537.36 OPR/31.0.1889.174
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-790.php
Opera 31.0Win10 10.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 31.0Blink Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 31.0.1889.174closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 31.0.1889.174closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 31.0Blink Windows 10desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 31.0.1889.174closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 31.0.1889closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.155closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 31.0.1889.174WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 31.0Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 31.0.1889.174closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:16 | by ThaDafinser