User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2012.3-R-1103.0957; xx; LA-I2 Build/IMM76I) UC AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
UC Browser Aliyun OS Webkit 534.31ChiliI2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2012.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2012.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2012.3closeAndroid 2012.3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2012.3-R-1103.0957closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.31Android 2012.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 534.31Aliyun OS ChiliI2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:26:15 | by ThaDafinser